1. Defender Capital opposes STAAR's sale to ALC due to inadequate valuation. 2. Concerns raised about the timing and pricing of the proposed transaction. 3. Flawed process leading to the deal criticized by shareholders. 4. Defender Capital's vote against sale potentially indicates shareholder unrest. 5. Previous performance indicators suggest STAAR's future could be positive.
FAQ
Why Bearish?
The opposition from Defender Capital could signal shareholder dissent, impacting ALC's stock negatively. Similar past deals, such as aggressive M&A negotiations, often lead to stock price declines when shareholder support is lacking.
How important is it?
The vote against the transaction involves key shareholders expressing dissatisfaction, which can affect stock performance significantly. Such shareholder activism can sway market perceptions and investor sentiment concerning ALC.
Why Short Term?
Immediate shareholder action around the impending vote could create short-term volatility in ALC's stock price. If ALC's acquisition of STAAR fails, it may lead to a swift market reaction.
Related Companies
Expresses Disappointment in the Board's and Management's Continued Pursuit of Ill-advised Deal
CHARLOTTE, N.C., Dec. 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Defender Capital ("Defender" or "we"), a long-term shareholder of STAAR Surgical Company ("STAAR" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: STAA) owning approximately 1.5% of the Company's outstanding common stock, today issued the following statement reiterating its intention to vote AGAINST the Company's proposed sale to Alcon Inc. ("Alcon") (NYSE:ALC) and expressing its disappointment in the Company's Board of Directors' (the "Board") continued pursuit of the deal:
As shareholders of STAAR Surgical for the past decade, we remain convicted in the long-term potential of the Company and are disappointed that the Board has continued to pursue the ill-advised sale to Alcon, which we do not believe is in the best interests of STAAR shareholders and does not represent adequate value for the Company. Specifically:
It's the wrong time and wrong price for STAAR shareholders:
For the past decade, STAAR has been making significant inroads globally. With increased screen usage's impact on vision and longer life expectancy, more people are in need of STAAR's differentiated products, leading us to believe the future is bright. Obviously, Alcon agrees, pursuing STAAR at a time when their Chinese business has been weak. Further, STAAR's board signed the Alcon deal right before second quarter earnings, which revealed stabilization in the business, representing potential upside for shareholders. We believe that major STAAR shareholder Broadwood Partners' December 17 press release pledging to constructively engage with the Board after the vote supports continued stability of the business and aligns with our conviction in STAAR's long-term value as an independent entity. Given these factors, this transaction has been proposed at the wrong time and at the wrong price for STAAR shareholders. In fact, we would argue that it is extremely opportunistic for Alcon shareholders to the detriment to STAAR shareholders.
The process leading to the deal was flawed:
Glass Lewis recommended shareholders vote against the deal, while ISS called the process deeply flawed. When deals are announced, event-driven hedge funds will sometimes buy the stock of the company to be acquired and make a little money when and if the deal closes. An all-cash deal by a major healthcare company looked attractive, we suppose, and apparently, some of them purchased shares without realizing that STAAR's largest shareholder for decades, Broadwood Partners, might not support the deal. When they and the second largest shareholder came out against the deal, the stock price traded lower, and we received calls from multiple concerned event-driven funds.
When it became clear that the Company did not have the vote, rather than let the Company's owners, its shareholders, determine the future of the business and accept defeat, STAAR delayed the vote until December 19 and reopened the bidding process. Given that 50% of STAAR's business is in China, a nation where obtaining good information about business operations is often a lengthy process, did the Board really think that window would be long enough for a potential acquirer to complete due diligence? Unsurprisingly, no new bids surfaced.
We continue to intend to vote AGAINST the transaction on December 19:
We continue to see no compelling reason to sell STAAR at this time. The future is always uncertain, however what is certain to us is that this process was flawed and the pattern laid out above leaves us with more questions than answers. We are disappointed that the Board has pursued this ill-advised transaction at a valuation that does not reflect the potential prospects of STAAR's business in the future, and intend to vote AGAINST the deal later this week.
About Defender Capital
Defender Capital, an SEC-Registered Investment Advisor, manages investment accounts – retirement accounts, non-retirement accounts, trusts, corporate accounts, donor-advised funds, etc. – for individuals, families, and corporations. We take a research driven, long-term approach, investing in U.S. equities.
Media Contact:
ASC Advisors
Taylor Ingraham (203 992 1230)
tingraham@ascadvisors.com
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/defender-capital-reiterates-intention-to-vote-against-staar-surgicals-proposed-sale-to-alcon-inc-302645186.html
SOURCE Defender Capital