1. DOJ proposed breaking Google's search monopoly with severe remedies. 2. Pichai claimed data-sharing could destroy Google's search business viability. 3. Judge skeptical about Google's payments securing default search placements. 4. DOJ warns Google leveraging AI may complicate market competition. 5. Google argues divesting Chrome and Android risks national security.
The DOJ's strong stance against Google could lead to significant operational changes, reminiscent of past antitrust actions that impacted tech giants like Microsoft in the late 1990s, leading to stock volatility and a decrease in investor confidence.
The proposed antitrust remedies directly threaten Google’s business model, which may reduce investor confidence and have substantial financial implications.
Long-term effects are pronounced as market structure changes may disrupt Google's revenue and growth potential, similar to effects observed post-Microsoft antitrust ruling over the years.