William H. Neukom, Microsoft Lawyer Who Led Antitrust Fight, Dies at 83
1. Microsoft was labeled a monopoly by the U.S. in the 1990s. 2. Despite losses in court, Microsoft emerged relatively unscathed.
FAQ
Why Neutral?
While historical scrutiny exists, Microsoft's current fundamentals and innovations mitigate monopoly concerns. Similar historical cases saw fluctuations but did not necessarily damage long-term growth.
How important is it?
The article reflects on Microsoft's past regulatory challenges; while not immediate, public perception and regulatory environment can influence future price expectations.
Why Long Term?
Regulatory concerns can lead to long-term pressure, but Microsoft's adaptive capabilities suggest resilience. Historical examples show that tech giants often adapt post-regulatory challenges.